La Salle National Bank & Trust Co. v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that revocation of a bank’s sewer connection entailed no appropriation of the bank’s sewers or land and thus did not constitute a taking of private property for public use; court emphasized that the bank had no vested right to sewer connection
• holding that revocation of a bank's sewer connection entailed no appropriation of the bank's sewers or land and thus did not constitute a taking of private property for public use; court emphasized that the bank had no vested right to sewer connection
• “An injunction is the proper remedy only when an unlawful appropriation of land is attempted for use by a public corporation which has not acquired this right by condemnation or otherwise.”; no taking found
• “As a general rule, a permit to connect to municipal sewers is in the nature of a license only; it does not create a vested right to such connection;” court found irrelevant to plaintiff’s claim that much time had passed and much money had been spent on sewer connection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).