Skip to main content
· 10/20/1958

La Manna v. California

Citations

  • 358 U.S. 862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • fraud and misrepresentation claims pre-empted because adjudication would require reference to and interpretation of terms of collective-bargaining agreement
  • state law misrepresentation claims were preempted because merits of allegations had to be evaluated in light of terms used in CBA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.