Skip to main content
· 5/24/1984

La Esperanza Townhome Ass'n v. Title Security Agency

Citations

  • 689 P.2d 178
  • 142 Ariz. 235
  • 1984 Ariz. App. LEXIS 467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that new plat was \null and void\ as an attempt to amend the declaration without meeting percentage approval requirement
  • concluding that amendments to restrictions that are not properly executed never become effective
  • concluding amendments to restrictions that are not properly executed never become effective
  • finding that the rule that an amended covenant must apply uniformly to all lots within a subdivision is the controlling law even when the proposed amendment seeks to release a few lots from all of the covenants as opposed to only a few of the restrictions
  • invalidating restriction for non-uniform application where amendment specifically excluded some property
  • “restrictions and conditions can only be changed uniformly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howard, Birdsall, Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.