La Cosecha, Inc. v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Guesses or speculation which raise merely a conjecture or possibility are not sufficient to create even an inference of fact for consideration on summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Isbell v. Credit Nation Lending Service, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-11-29· cited 25×
• Mansell v. Starr Enterprises/Texaco, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-07-01· cited 18×
• AFLAC, INC. v. Hardy
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-07-13· cited 6×
• SAULSBURY Et Al. v. WILSON.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-02-08· cited 5×
• Jonathan Isbell v. Credit Nation Lending Service
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-11-29

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lau's Corp., Inc. v. Haskins
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1991-06-27· cited 2,024×
• Sharfuddin v. Drug Emporium, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-02-20· cited 49×
• Brown v. Amerson
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-02-22· cited 38×
• Tuggle v. Helms
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-19· cited 31×
• Kappa Sigma International Fraternity v. Tootle
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-06-27· cited 30×
• Birnbrey, Minsk & Minsk, LLC v. Yirga
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-06-12· cited 20×
• Chelena v. GEORGIA FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-10-22· cited 14×
• Michelin Tire Corp. v. Irving
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-01-26· cited 7×