Skip to main content
· 11/16/1908

La Compagnie Générale Transatlantique v. Persaglio

Citations

  • 165 F. 638
  • 91 C.C.A. 610
  • 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4801

Syllabus

<p>Evidence (§ 474*) — Opinion Evidence — Competency—BIeans op Knowledge op Facts.</p> <p>Upon an issue as to the value of the contents of certain trunks, in an action against a carrier for its loss, the fact that it consisted largely of c-lotliing bought by plaintiff’s wife for the family, and that he did not know the prices paid, did not render him incompetent to testify as to such value, approximately; it being a matter not capable of exact ascertainment.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Evidence, Cent. Dig. §§ 2215-2218; Dec. Dig. § 474.*]</p>

Judges: Coxe, Lacombe, Ward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.