Skip to main content
· 12/26/1974

Federal Case

Citations

  • 506 F.2d 339

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the court will not find an implied averment of a threatened federal action where federal relief was only one of three available avenues of litigation
  • “The brute fact is that defendant’s status as a federal trademark owner is a matter for defense [that is] wholly inappropriate to the federal question determinations.’’
  • noting Congressional intent to limit removal jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.