L. S. Land Co. v. Burns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e cannot hold as a matter of law that attorney’s fees in this reformation case were not authorized under [OCGA] § 13-6-11.”
• “[W]e cannot hold as a matter of law that attorney’s fees in this reformation case were not authorized under [OCGA] § 13-6-11.”
• buyer’s lack of diligence irrelevant and could not prevent the grant of equitable reformation
• theory of reformation was before the trial court as complainant made a pre-trial motion to amend pleadings to seek reformation of the contract, and, in oral ruling, trial court referred to reformation of contracts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).