L. & S. Bearing Co. v. Morton Bearing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “where a written contract is not ambiguous ... extraneous matter will not be considered” and “subsequent acts of the parties” are irrelevant
• “In Michigan the law is clear that where a written contract is not ambiguous the intention of the parties as expressed on the face thereof must be followed....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).