L. & N. R. R. v. Trisler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excluding co-worker’s “conclusory” testimony that he “remembers thinking, my god, they just walked into a lawsuit” when he heard of plaintiff’s termination
• “[I]n an employment discrimination action, as is the case here, Rule 701 bars lay opinion testimony that amounts to a naked speculation concerning the motivation for a defendant’s adverse employment decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).