L. & N. R. R. v. Street's Admx

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that general or vague statements of intention or optimism are puffery
• dismissing claims that showed “no more than [Defendant’s] off-label promotion . . . which does not by itself state a claim for fraud or misrepresentation”
• dismissing fraud claims when the plaintiff did not allege any facts in the complaint that defendant drug company misrepresented the content of the labels
• applying Rule 9(b) to Connecticut common law negligent misrepresentation claims
• FDA regulations generally prohibit off-label promotion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).