Skip to main content
· 3/18/1911

L. & N. R. R. v. Gay

Citations

  • 143 Ky. 56
  • 135 S.W. 400
  • 1911 Ky. LEXIS 319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “New York law limits jurisdiction to tort claims,” so a contract claim could not support a finding of personal jurisdiction under C.P.L.R. § 302(a)
  • \[A]ny claim for misrepresentation-either fraudulent or negligent-must meet Rule 9 's heightened pleading standards....\
  • “[F]or claims involving a nonphysical, commercial injury” “the situs of the injury is where the critical events associated with the dispute took place.”
  • “[A]ny claim for misrepresentation—either fraudulent or negligent—must meet Rule 9's heightened pleading standards[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.