· 3/3/1910
L. & N. R. R. v. Eckman
Citations
- 137 Ky. 331
- 125 S.W. 729
- 1910 Ky. LEXIS 576
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing unjust enrichment claim, pled in the alternative with a breach of contract claim, because the plaintiff did not challenge the existence of the insurance policy at issue
- plaintiff may be entitled to consequential damages on its breach of contract claim, beyond the limits of its Policy, based on bad faith.”
- “Like good faith and fair dealing claims, a claim for ‘bad faith denial of coverage . . . would be duplicative of a claim sounding in breach of contract.”
- “Under New York law, parties to an express contract are bound by an implied duty of good faith, but breach of that duty is merely a breach of the underlying contract.” (citation omitted)
- “Under New York law, parties to an express contract are bound by an implied duty of good faith, but breach of that duty is merely a breach of the underlying contract.” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Settle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.