Skip to main content
· 3/3/1910

L. & N. R. R. v. Eckman

Citations

  • 137 Ky. 331
  • 125 S.W. 729
  • 1910 Ky. LEXIS 576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing unjust enrichment claim, pled in the alternative with a breach of contract claim, because the plaintiff did not challenge the existence of the insurance policy at issue
  • plaintiff may be entitled to consequential damages on its breach of contract claim, beyond the limits of its Policy, based on bad faith.”
  • “Like good faith and fair dealing claims, a claim for ‘bad faith denial of coverage . . . would be duplicative of a claim sounding in breach of contract.”
  • “Under New York law, parties to an express contract are bound by an implied duty of good faith, but breach of that duty is merely a breach of the underlying contract.” (citation omitted)
  • “Under New York law, parties to an express contract are bound by an implied duty of good faith, but breach of that duty is merely a breach of the underlying contract.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Settle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.