Skip to main content
· 1/25/1995

L & F Products, a Division of Sterling Winthrop Inc. v. Procter & Gamble Company

Citations

  • 45 F.3d 709
  • 33 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1621
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1534
  • 1995 WL 30895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that where the challenged advertisement is impliedly false, extrinsic evidence must confirm that the advertisement is likely to mislead or confuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altimari, Leval, Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.