L. E. Myers Co. v. Harbor Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• enforcing a reformation where an excess carrier had not relied on the initial version of the primary policy
• excess insurer who followed form to underlying policy without reading it bound by reformation of the underlying policy to remedy underlying parties’ mistake of fact
• “there is no claim made that [Harbor] had been advised by either [Myers or its broker] as to what coverage was provided by the Continental policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).