Skip to main content
· 10/12/1999

L & D Trucking v. Minnesota Department of Transportation

Citations

  • 600 N.W.2d 734
  • 1999 Minn. App. LEXIS 1128
  • 1999 WL 809805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the prevailing wage law \provides for enforcement in the district court of the county in which the work was located\
  • noting that the prevailing wage law “provides for enforcement in the district court of the county in which the work was located”
  • noting that, even in the absence of a valid rule, it would be an absurd result to preclude an agency from enforcing a statute on a case-by-case basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Willis, Anderson, Foley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.