Skip to main content
· 3/5/1986

Federal Case

Citations

  • 784 F.2d 1200
  • 16 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20503
  • 23 ERC (BNA) 2105
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that plaintiffs were entitled to fees because they have “served the public interest”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.