Kyser v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to reduce the plaintiff attorney’s hours based on his billing in fifteen minute increments where the defendants failed to specifically identify any actions taken by the plaintiff’s counsel that resulted in an artificial inflation of hours
• EAJA fees awarded when counsel was able to show “that the hours claimed were actual hours expended and that they were recorded contemporaneously.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).