Skip to main content
· 1/5/1988

Kyrtatas v. Stop & Shop, Inc.

Citations

  • 205 Conn. 694
  • 535 A.2d 357
  • 1988 Conn. LEXIS 5

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “decree of the circuit court was error” which would require reversal and remand “if the appellants could be benefitted by any further proceedings that could be taken” but since “no further proceeding would change the final result” decree is affirmed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.