Kyrene School District No. 28 v. City of Chandler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a school “receiv[ed] the overall benefit of [a city’s] water and wastewater systems in exchange for . . . system development charges”
• stating that “fees” were not rendered “taxes” by virtue of fact that water system development fees would benefit other current and future users of the water system
• concluding a “water system development fee” and a “wastewater system development fee” were development “fees” and not taxes; therefore, the school district was not immune from paying them
• rejecting the argument that charges were taxes because they were used to provide citywide water and sewer service

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).