Skip to main content
· 9/2/2005

Kym Lobzun v. United States

Citations

  • 422 F.3d 503
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 19031
  • 2005 WL 2106154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[alb-sent exceptional circumstances, written notice of forfeiture by certified mail to the claimant’s residence satisfies due process, even if the claimant does not receive actual notice”
  • publication of notice in The Wall Street Journal where currency seized in Chicago from resident of Vancouver, Canada
  • de novo review of whether DEA’s notice procedures complied with due process
  • adequacy of forfeiture notice proce- dures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Posner, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.