Kyles v. Contractors/Engineers Supply, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that timely administrative filing requirement was not jurisdictional but a statute of limitations subject to waiver and equitable tolling
• stating that when 21 interpreting the ACRA, courts “follow federal case law interpreting Title VII when no 22 Arizona precedent exists”
• stating that when interpreting the ACRA, courts “follow federal case 8 law interpreting Title VII when no Arizona precedent exists”
• applying doctrine when right-to-sue letter from Arizona Attorney General’s office contained incorrect date by which plaintiff was required to sue on his claim
• applying equitable tolling where the plaintiff relied on an incorrect 4 deadline in his right-to-sue notice
• “Equitable tolling applies when the plaintiff is excusably ignorant of the 5 limitations period and the defendant would not be prejudiced by the late filing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).