Kyle v. Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling on the merits where plaintiff had named supervisors in their official capacities
• “When faced with ambiguous statutes we apply our canons of statutory construction, considering background and context in an attempt to discover true legislative intent.”
• “When faced with ambiguous statutes we apply our canons of statutory construction, considering background and context in an attempt to discover true legislative intent.”
• “We cannot amend a statute judicially, and we cannot read implausible meaning into express statutory language.”
• “we cannot read [an] implausible meaning into express statutory language.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).