Kyle Haynes v. Jacky J. Jumper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding accrual under the discovery rule occurs when plaintiff learns he has been harmed, not when plaintiff learns that harm is legally cognizable
• explaining that recoupment and rescission are consistently treated as separate, nonoverlapping, remedies; a buyer defrauded in the purchase of property may seek rescission or recoupment, not both
• defamation claim accrues “on publication of the defamatory statement,” which occurs when the statement “is communicated to a third party” (quotation marks omitted)
• knowledge of responsible person’s identity is implicit in requirement that plaintiff know the defendant’s conduct caused him harm
• \a cause of action accrues when the plaintiff discovers or with reasonable diligence should have discovered that [1] he has suffered harm; [2] his harm was caused by the conduct of another; and [3] the defendant is the person who caused that harm\
• relying on Friedman v. Jablonksi, supra

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).