KYLE E. MCCLAMMA v. MARK GLASS, COMMISSIONER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Office of Thrift Supervision receives no deference for its interpretation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act because it shares the administration of the statute with other agencies
• finding no \reason to believe that the congressional delegation of administrative authority contemplates such peculiar corollaries\
• finding no “reason to believe that the congressional delegation of administrative authority contemplates such peculiar corollaries”
• one agency’s interpretation of a statute is not entitled to deference when several other agencies share administration of the statute
• “[T]he fundamental characteristic of unjust enrichment is that the defendant has been unjustly enriched by receiving something that properly belongs to the plaintiff, thereby forcing restoration to the plaintiff.”
• no deference in Chevron context if more than one agency given authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).