Kycoga Land Co. v. Kentucky River Coal Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that when law enforcement failed to secure sworn testimony as required by the warrant statute, Wis. Stat. §§ 4839-40 (1923), the warrant was invalid for failing both the statutory and constitutional requirements
• determining that when law enforcement failed to secure sworn testimony as required by the warrant statute, Wis. Stat. §§ 4839-40 (1923), the warrant was invalid for failing both the statutory and constitutional requirements
• suppressing evidence because no sworn testimony existed to support the warrant
• suppressing evidence because no sworn testimony existed to support the warrant
• “The essential prerequisite to the issuance of a valid search warrant is the taking of sworn testimony….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).