Skip to main content
· 12/4/1992

Kwasniewski v. Schaid

Citations

  • 607 N.E.2d 214
  • 153 Ill. 2d 550
  • 180 Ill. Dec. 320
  • 1992 Ill. LEXIS 197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that we may take judicial notice of the location of counties
  • “[a] plaintiffs ‘home forum’ for purposes of an interstate forum non conveniens motion is the plaintiffs home State”
  • “It is all but incongruous for defendants to argue that their own home county is inconvenient.”
  • “It is all but incongruous for defendants to argue that their own home county is inconvenient.”
  • \It is all but incongruous for defendants to argue that their own home county is inconvenient.\
  • “It is all but incongruous for defendants to argue that their own home county is inconvenient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heiple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.