Skip to main content

K.W. v. State

Citations

  • 13 So. 3d 90
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony from witness who lacked personal knowledge of the value of stolen cell phone was insufficient to establish value in petit theft trial where the witness did not know the phone's age, quality, condition, or to what extent its value had depreciated
  • reducing theft conviction to second degree petit theft where state failed to prove the value of the stolen cell phone exceeded $100
  • rejecting the notion that a nice cell phone automatically met the “minimum value” for grand theft under section 812.012(10)(b)
  • rejecting the notion that a nice cell phone automatically met the \minimum value\ for grand theft under section 812.012(10)(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lagoa, Rothenberg, Salter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.