Kuykendall v. Top Notch Laminates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to impose liability on a social provider of alcohol because, absent a special relationship, there is no duty to control the conduct of a third party
• Refusing to impose dram shop liability upon an employer, on the grounds of lack of control. \There is nothing in the matter sub judice to suggest that Top Notch had a right to control Wilkes' actions after business hours.\
• Refusing to impose dram shop liability upon an employer, on the grounds of lack of control. “There is nothing in the matter sub judice to suggest that Top Notch had a right to control Wilkes’ actions after business hours.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).