· 1/5/2000
Kusyk v. Water Resources Department
Citations
- 994 P.2d 798
- 164 Or. App. 738
- 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 2
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling was “ ‘in favor’ of petitioners” where agency reassessment required by court’s remand “will likely be beneficial to [the] petitioners’ concerns”
- “We have also avoided characterizing what constitutes a vindication of someone’s rights by merely labeling whether a judgment is a ‘procedural’ or ‘substantive’ victory.”
- “We cannot ascertain from the record on which statutory ground the trial court awarded fees nor the basis for making an award under that provision.”
- “[I]n order for a decision to qualify as being ‘in favor of the petitioner’ under ORS 183.497, it must be a more than de minim[i]s victory.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: De Muniz, Haselton, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.