Kushner v. Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that actions can only be attributed to the state if they were \exclusively and traditionally\ public
• holding that assessing whether a private entity’s conduct constituted state action is a “necessarily fact-bound inquiry”
• holding that there was no \pervasive entwinement” where the city \had no role in enacting or enforcing [the private entity’s] restriction on distribution of literature”
• holding that the regulatory activity of a private, statewide athletic association \should be treated as state action owing to the pervasive entwinement of state school officials in the structure of the association.\
• holding that assessing whether a private entity’s conduct constituted state action is a “necessarily fact-bound inquiry”
• holding that actions can only be attributed to the state if they were “exclusively and traditionally” public

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).