Skip to main content
· 9/25/2017

Kushner v. Buhta

Citations

  • 322 F.R.D. 494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • conclusory allegations that witnesses and documents are no longer available insufficient evidence of prejudice to warrant dismissal of Title VII action where plaintiffs counsel was responsible for two year delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.