Kush v. Mathison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that due regard is given to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses
• stating that the intent of the harasser may be determined using a subjective standard
• stating that witness credibility determinations are within the purview of the district court
• finding harassment based, in part, on face- to-face confrontations, use of crude and profane language, and use of abusive and profane names
• stating 3 that appellate courts defer to the district court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of witnesses
• affirming harassment finding when record showed that two specific instances and other general harassing conduct taken together formed repeated incidents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).