Kush v. Lloyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute of repose, as against a doctor who negligently advised a plaintiff, ran from the date the negligent advice was given
• holding the impact rule was inapplicable to a parent’s claim for wrongful birth of their severely deformed child
• explaining that a statute of repose \eliminate[s] a cause of action\
• recognizing an exception for wrongful birth resulting from negligent medical advice
• tort law meant to put injured party in nearly the state that would have existed absent negligent injury
• plaintiffs were on notice of their child's injury, i.e., a genetic abnormality, shortly following the child's birth

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).