Kurtz v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony that a substance had begun to dry at the edge could support a reasonable 9 inference that it had been on the floor for long enough to be discovered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Zumbusch v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
  D. Oregon· 2013-04-17· cited 2×
• Johnson v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
  District of Columbia· 2025-08-05

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tennant v. Shoppers Food Warehouse MD Corp.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-06· cited 97×
• Moulden v. Greenbelt Consumer Services, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-06-08· cited 67×
• Lexington Market Authority v. Zappala
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-02-04· cited 44×
• Foley v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1936-01-27· cited 44×
• Smith v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1999-12-16· cited 22×
• Burwell v. Easton Memorial Hospital
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-07-06· cited 21×
• Audas v. Montgomery Ward, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-04· cited 9×