Kurtz v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \following spouse doctrine\ does not apply to an unmarried heterosexual couple because, until there is a marriage, there is no family unit
• holding that the “following spouse doc trine” does not apply to an unmarried heterosexual couple because, until there is a marriage, there is no family unit
• refusing to apply the doctrine where there was no \family unit\ because a woman left her job shortly before her marriage and, in any event, made no showing that circumstances required making a home elsewhere
• refusing to apply the doctrine where there was no “family unit” because a woman left her job shortly before her marriage and, in any event, made no showing that circumstances required making a home elsewhere

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).