Skip to main content
· 3/2/1925

Kurtz v. Independent Hat Lining Co.

Citations

  • 6 F.2d 578
  • 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2090

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the state must do more than simply offer conclusory statements” to satisfy its burdens
  • applying similar principles in the negative context, i.e., state compulsion not to practice religious belief by state's refusal to provide facilities to prisoner
  • taking judicial notice of \the central and fundamental role played by the Sacred Sweat Lodge in many Native American religions\
  • “[RFRA] need not drive a prison to employ clergy from every sect or creed found within its walls.”
  • “[Gjovernment regulation must significantly inhibit or constrain conduct or expression that manifests some central tenet of a [person’s] individual beliefs.”
  • religious symbols play important role in expressing an individual’s adherence to a particular faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.