· 7/18/1989
Kurtz v. Allied Corp.
Citations
- 561 A.2d 1294
- 127 Pa. Commw. 384
- 1989 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 501
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he effect of an order of the Board vacating the [WCJ’s] decision and remanding the case to the [WCJ] for further findings is to reinstate the [NCP] prior to the [WCJ’s] decision.”
- The filing party “strictly complied with the requirements of [] [S]ection [428 of the Act] by filing a certified copy of the [WCJ’s] order and a praecipe for judgment with the prothonotary’s office of the trial court.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Colins, Smith, Kalish
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.