Skip to main content
· 7/18/1989

Kurtz v. Allied Corp.

Citations

  • 561 A.2d 1294
  • 127 Pa. Commw. 384
  • 1989 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he effect of an order of the Board vacating the [WCJ’s] decision and remanding the case to the [WCJ] for further findings is to reinstate the [NCP] prior to the [WCJ’s] decision.”
  • The filing party “strictly complied with the requirements of [] [S]ection [428 of the Act] by filing a certified copy of the [WCJ’s] order and a praecipe for judgment with the prothonotary’s office of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colins, Smith, Kalish

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.