· 1/27/1993
Kurtz, Richards, Wilson & Co. v. Insurance Communicators Marketing Corp.
Citations
- 12 Cal. App. 4th 1249
- 16 Cal. Rptr. 2d 259
- 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 665
- 16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2210
- 93 Daily Journal DAR 1253
- 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 70
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that dual agency can be established where a special relationship exists
- noting a limited exception where an agent has acted as a “dual agent” representing both the insured and the insurer
- in a negligence case, “where the agent contracts in the name of the insurer and does not exceed that authority, the insurer is liable, and not the agent”
- dual agency relationship found where independent broker was contacted by plaintiff in order to procure insurance coverage
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Epstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.