Skip to main content
· 1/27/1993

Kurtz, Richards, Wilson & Co. v. Insurance Communicators Marketing Corp.

Citations

  • 12 Cal. App. 4th 1249
  • 16 Cal. Rptr. 2d 259
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 665
  • 16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2210
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 1253
  • 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 70

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that dual agency can be established where a special relationship exists
  • noting a limited exception where an agent has acted as a “dual agent” representing both the insured and the insurer
  • in a negligence case, “where the agent contracts in the name of the insurer and does not exceed that authority, the insurer is liable, and not the agent”
  • dual agency relationship found where independent broker was contacted by plaintiff in order to procure insurance coverage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Epstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.