Kurth v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s evidence that he could not work with a particular person was “insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact on whether he suffers from an impairment that substantially limits a major life activity of working”
• holding, with respect to retaliation claim brought under Rehabilitation Act, that plaintiff “engaged in statutorily protected activity when he and his counsel requested that the BOP make reasonable accommodations for what they perceived as [plaintiff’s] disability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).