Kurt Russell v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to remand where nothing in the record rebutted “the presumption ‘that the district court knew and applied the law correctly.’” (quoting United States v. Ayers, 428 F.3d 312, 315 (D.C. Cir. 2005))
• “Ordinarily, an issue raised for first time at oral argument is ‘waived because it was not raised in [the] briefs.’” (alteration in original) (quoting Ark Las Vegas Rest. Corp. v. NLRB, 334 F.3d 99, 108 n.4 (D.C. Cir. 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).