Kurn v. Stanfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an early right-to-sue letter did, in fact, result in the premature termination of the mandatory investigation only twenty-one days after the filing of the charge
• recognizing the critical importance of the “reasonable cause” determination in the EEOC’s administrative procedures
• commenting on the merits of one of the issues on appeal despite this court’s dismissal of the appellant’s complaint because of the possibility that “this issue [would] arise again in a new trial”
• dismissing an early right-to- sue letter and holding the regulation invalid as contrary to the EEOC’s statutory mandate
• barring a Title VII claim because the right to sue letter was issued before 180 days, using the same logic as Gibb
• invalidating the regulation on the grounds that it conflicted impermissibly with congressional intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).