Kurlandzik v. Probst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “if [the claim for fire damages had been] asserted in a court of law, [it] would unquestionably have been a suit for damages”
• noting that a “setoff [was] limited to defeating the plaintiff’s claim” under California law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).