Skip to main content
· 12/27/2000

Kurczaba v. Pollock

Citations

  • 742 N.E.2d 425
  • 252 Ill. Dec. 175
  • 318 Ill. App. 3d 686
  • 2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 996

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding, with little discussion, that the privilege did not apply where an attorney published the defamatory contents of a pleading he also drafted
  • refusing to extend the privilege to statements made by an attorney to a reporter in connection with a case
  • stating that rule in a purely civil context
  • collecting cases, emphasizing Illinois courts typically find allegations insufficient to plead special damages
  • allegations that the plaintiff was damaged monetarily by losing gainful employment and wages and had suffered great mental pain and anguish for which she underwent expensive treatment
  • allegations that the plaintiffs “suffered a loss of business and income” and “great embarrassment” were insufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.