Skip to main content
· 5/22/1980

Kupfer v. State

Citations

  • 414 A.2d 907
  • 287 Md. 540
  • 1980 Md. LEXIS 175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellate courts have jurisdiction to review a modification of probation stemming from a finding of a violation of probation conditions
  • holding that trial court should have dismissed probation violation proceeding because maximum probationary period had elapsed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, C.J., and Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson and Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.