Skip to main content
· 1/3/1911

Kunzman v. Pittsburg Railways Co.

Citations

  • 230 Pa. 364
  • 79 A. 635
  • 1911 Pa. LEXIS 617

Syllabus

<p>Negligence — Street railways — Evidence—Rebuttal.</p> <p>In an action against a street railway company to recover damages for personal injuries, where several witnesses for the defendant, after testifying that they saw the plaintiff run towards a car and attempt to get on when it was in motion, are confronted with another person in court, and they assert he was not the man, such person may be called in rebuttal to testify that he remembered the accident, and that it was he who had rim towards the car while it was in motion.</p>

Judges: Brown, Elkin, Mestrezat, Moschzisker, Potter, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.