Kunzer v. Magill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[p]rivate citizens . . . do not have standing to enforce criminal statutes or have them enforced”
• stating that “[p]rivate citizens, such as [plaintiff], do not have standing to enforce criminal statutes or have them enforced”
• stating that “[p]rivate citizens, such as [plaintiff], do not have standing to enforce criminal statutes or have them enforced”
• noting that “private citizens generally have no standing to institute federal criminal proceedings.”
• a private citizen does not have authority to initiate a criminal proceeding, or to seek to have a criminal proceeding opened against another person or entity
• a private citizen does not have authority to initiate a criminal proceeding, or to seek to have a criminal proceeding opened against another person or entity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).