Skip to main content
· 10/14/1993

Kuntz v. Pardo (In Re W.T. Grant Co.)

Citations

  • 160 B.R. 35
  • 28 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 252
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in considering whether excusable neglect is present, appellant’s “status as a pro se litigant is of little import,” given that appellant “has amassed litigation experience” and “has already filed no fewer than eight appeals, all unsuccessful”
  • in considering whether excusable neglect is present, appellant’s “status as a pro se litigant is of little import,” given that appellant “has amassed litigation experience” and “has already filed no fewer than eight appeals, all unsuccessful”
  • denying motion for rule 11 sanctions against pro se plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.