Skip to main content
· 3/21/1898

Kunsemiller v. Hill

Citations

  • 86 F. 198
  • 29 C.C.A. 658
  • 1898 U.S. App. LEXIS 2264

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Title VI “specifically limits the action of federal departments or agencies to employment practices in programs receiving federal financial 9 NDI also argues that the Title VI claim was not filed within the requisite statute of limitations. (See D.E. 6-1 at 42–44.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riner, Sanborn, Thayer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.