Kumolu v. Kumolu

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 1669

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in its decision terminating the parties' marriage and issuing its decree of divorce. The trial court did not err in not finding a later date as the commencement of the date of marriage and further indicating that appellant should have filed a motion earlier in the case. Neither did the trial court err in awarding modifiable spousal support to Wife. The trial court also did not err in finding the testimony of both Mercy Kumolu and Husband not credible. Further, the trial court did not err in its designation of the minor child as a Castle child. Finally, the trial court did not fail to provide guidance as to the tax exemption status for the minor child and therefore made no error in this regard. Judgment affirmed.