Skip to main content
· 1/15/1985

Kumar Corp. v. Nopal Lines, Ltd.

Citations

  • 462 So. 2d 1178
  • 10 Fla. L. Weekly 189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the “real party in interest” is “the person in whom rests, by substantive law, the claim sought to be enforced”
  • “It is a fundamental proposition of the law of agency that a principal may subsequently ratify its agent’s act, even if originally unauthorized, and such ratification relates back and supplies the original authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hubbart, Daniel S. Pearson and Ferguson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.